Earl Aagaard’s opinions about everything that interests him. Og also enjoys gardening, travel, reading, woodbutchery, and lots of other stuff.
Powered by ExpressionEngine
We could, of course, listen to the campaign rhetoric, and be (at least somewhat) hopeful.
Or, we could check out DAVID HARDY’S ARTICLE on Pajamas Media:
As a presidential candidate, Barack Obama must demonstrate executive experience, but he remains strangely silent about his eight years (1994-2002) as a director of the Joyce Foundation, a billion dollar tax-exempt organization. He has one obvious reason: during his time as director, Joyce Foundation spent millions creating and supporting anti-gun organizations.
There is another, less known, reason.
I’ll admit that I had not heard about Obama’s directorship of the Joyce Foundation, and I’m following this election closer than most Americans.
...as a Joyce director, Obama was involved in a wealthy foundation’s attempt to manipulate the Supreme Court, buy legal scholarship, and obliterate the individual right to arms.
Voters who value the Constitution should ask whether someone who was party to that plan should be nominating future Supreme Court justices.
.
.
If that sounds a bit strong to you, then you need to READ THE WHOLE THING
Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 10/07 at 08:58 PM